Celtic vs New Zealander Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Celtic
New Zealander
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Celtics
New Zealanders
4.9%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs New Zealander Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,426,082 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.430 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,766,859 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.823 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 0.89%.

Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | New Zealander |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 19.4% | 56.7% |
| Range | 19.0% | 55.7% |
| Mean | 6.3% | 7.4% |
| Median | 5.1% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 6.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 10.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 9.9% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and New Zealanders by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Belgium (4.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Nepal (4.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from North America (4.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Hungarian (4.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Cuban (4.9%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Filipino (5.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Australia (5.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Turkish (5.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Mongolian (5.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Netherlands (5.0%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 98.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Celtics | 98.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | North America | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Hungarians | 98.3 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Cubans | 98.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 98.3 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Osage | 98.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| German Russians | 98.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.0 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Russians | 98.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.0 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 98.0 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 97.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Mongolians | 97.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Turks | 97.6 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| New Zealanders | 97.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Filipinos | 97.3 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 97.3 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.0% |