Burmese vs Turkish Male Unemployment
COMPARE
Burmese
Turkish
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
Burmese
Turks
4.9%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Turkish Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,600,368 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,353,998 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.273 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Turkish |
| Minimum | 0.50% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 10.7% | 9.5% |
| Range | 10.2% | 7.9% |
| Mean | 4.6% | 4.9% |
| Median | 4.5% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Turks by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Northern European (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Chinese (4.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Belgium (4.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Japan (4.9%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Lithuanian (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (5.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Yugoslavian (5.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Czechoslovakian (5.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Jordanian (5.0%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.4 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Burmese | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Chinese | 99.3 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Bhutanese | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Poles | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Croatians | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Slovenes | 98.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Irish | 98.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Jordanians | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 98.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Turks | 98.5 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Lithuanians | 98.5 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.0% |