Burmese vs Scottish Male Unemployment
COMPARE
Burmese
Scottish
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
Burmese
Scottish
4.9%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.8%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Scottish Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,600,368 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 556,190,347 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.569 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 2.2%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Burmese | Scottish |
Minimum | 0.50% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 10.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 10.2% | 98.1% |
Mean | 4.6% | 18.3% |
Median | 4.5% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 17.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 12.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 25.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 25.0% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Scottish by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Northern European (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Scotch-Irish (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Chinese (4.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Belgium (4.9%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Bulgarian (4.8%, a difference of 0.13%), British (4.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Belgian (4.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Dutch (4.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and Zimbabwean (4.8%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.8% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Sudanese | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Paraguayans | 99.5 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Scotch-Irish | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.4 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Burmese | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Chinese | 99.3 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.9% |