Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Fort Worth, TX

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Public Transit
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Fort Worth
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Fort Worth

0.0%
60.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Fort Worth Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Fort Worth, TX

Zip Code % Public Transit vs State vs National
1.7610755.4%38.9%(+16.5)#4738.5%(+16.9)#740
2.7610854.8%38.9%(+15.9)#5638.5%(+16.3)#807
3.7611253.3%38.9%(+14.4)#7138.5%(+14.8)#1,010
4.7613252.4%38.9%(+13.5)#7738.5%(+13.9)#1,133
5.7610350.9%38.9%(+12.0)#9538.5%(+12.4)#1,357
6.7610550.0%38.9%(+11.1)#10838.5%(+11.5)#1,524
7.7610446.2%38.9%(+7.30)#15238.5%(+7.70)#2,413
8.7613746.1%38.9%(+7.20)#15338.5%(+7.60)#2,429
9.7611946.0%38.9%(+7.10)#15538.5%(+7.50)#2,459
10.7616445.6%38.9%(+6.70)#15938.5%(+7.10)#2,561
11.7614845.0%38.9%(+6.10)#17038.5%(+6.50)#2,726
12.7611844.6%38.9%(+5.70)#17738.5%(+6.10)#2,834
13.7613342.9%38.9%(+4.00)#19438.5%(+4.40)#3,278
14.7610240.9%38.9%(+2.00)#23338.5%(+2.40)#3,887
15.7611039.6%38.9%(+0.700)#25038.5%(+1.10)#4,326
16.7611631.5%38.9%(-7.40)#36538.5%(-7.00)#6,558
17.7614029.8%38.9%(-9.10)#38738.5%(-8.70)#6,911
18.7611529.7%38.9%(-9.20)#38838.5%(-8.80)#6,937
19.7615525.8%38.9%(-13.1)#42538.5%(-12.7)#7,496

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Fort Worth, TX?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Fort Worth, TX are:
#1
55.4%
#2
54.8%
#3
53.3%
#4
52.4%
#5
50.9%
#6
50.0%
#7
46.2%
#8
46.1%
#9
46.0%
#10
45.6%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Fort Worth, TX?
76107 has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Fort Worth, TX with 55.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Fort Worth, TX?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Fort Worth is 45.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Texas?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Texas is 38.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States is 38.5%.