Haitian vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Haitian
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Haitians
Immigrants from Northern Africa
20.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
288th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
72.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Haitian vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 284,231,337 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Haitians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 20.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,657,809 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.692 and weighted average of 16.0%, a difference of 28.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Haitian | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Minimum | 1.5% | 6.2% |
Maximum | 53.2% | 78.6% |
Range | 51.7% | 72.3% |
Mean | 22.0% | 22.9% |
Median | 20.2% | 16.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.4% | 24.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 16.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 16.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Haitians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Haitians are Blackfeet (20.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Iroquois (20.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Belize (20.6%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Haiti (20.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and Chippewa (20.6%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 20.2% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 20.3% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 20.3% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 20.3% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 20.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 20.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 20.5% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 20.5% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 20.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 20.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are French (16.0%, a difference of 0.11%), French Canadian (16.1%, a difference of 0.47%), Slovak (15.9%, a difference of 0.49%), Guamanian/Chamorro (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Oceania (16.1%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |