Alsatian vs Shoshone Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Alsatian
Shoshone
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Alsatians
Shoshone
24.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alsatian vs Shoshone Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,305,024 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.587 and weighted average of 24.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,449,019 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.130 and weighted average of 25.1%, a difference of 2.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alsatian | Shoshone |
Minimum | 10.5% | 9.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 89.5% | 90.9% |
Mean | 40.8% | 39.8% |
Median | 27.9% | 30.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.1% | 24.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 52.7% | 50.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 34.6% | 25.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 30.0% | 23.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 29.2% | 23.4% |
Demographics Similar to Alsatians and Shoshone by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are American (24.5%, a difference of 0.080%), French American Indian (24.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Osage (24.4%, a difference of 0.37%), Hispanic or Latino (24.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and Indonesian (24.3%, a difference of 0.97%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Honduran (25.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Blackfeet (25.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Mexican (25.0%, a difference of 0.34%), Somali (25.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Congo (25.3%, a difference of 0.66%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 24.4% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 24.5% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 24.5% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 24.6% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 24.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 24.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 24.8% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 24.9% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 25.0% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |