Tsimshian vs Samoan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Samoan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Tsimshian
Samoans
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
69.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
79.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Samoan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,624,889 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,914,322 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121 and weighted average of 8.6%, a difference of 1.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tsimshian | Samoan |
Minimum | 3.9% | 0.54% |
Maximum | 22.7% | 29.9% |
Range | 18.9% | 29.4% |
Mean | 9.9% | 8.8% |
Median | 7.7% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 10.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Samoans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Oceania (8.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Brazilian (8.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Mongolian (8.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |