Tsimshian vs Costa Rican Family Poverty
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Costa Rican
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Tsimshian
Costa Ricans
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
69.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
49.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Costa Rican Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,624,889 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,260,366 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 9.0%, a difference of 2.8%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tsimshian | Costa Rican |
Minimum | 3.9% | 0.94% |
Maximum | 22.7% | 33.1% |
Range | 18.9% | 32.2% |
Mean | 9.9% | 9.5% |
Median | 7.7% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 10.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Costa Ricans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Oceania (8.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Albania (9.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (9.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Fiji (8.9%, a difference of 0.94%), Immigrants from Peru (8.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and Lebanese (8.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Peru | 57.5 /100 | #172 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 56.4 /100 | #173 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 9.0% |
Costa Ricans | 49.3 /100 | #175 | Average 9.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 47.5 /100 | #176 | Average 9.0% |