Chilean vs Samoan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chilean
Samoan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Chileans
Samoans
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
79.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Samoan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,264,406 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,914,322 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121 and weighted average of 8.6%, a difference of 1.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chilean | Samoan |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.54% |
Maximum | 19.1% | 29.9% |
Range | 18.1% | 29.4% |
Mean | 8.0% | 8.8% |
Median | 7.9% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 10.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Samoans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Sri Lankan (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (8.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Brazil (8.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (8.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and Armenian (8.5%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Brazilian (8.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Mongolian (8.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |