Somali vs Ute Female Poverty
COMPARE
Somali
Ute
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Somalis
Ute
16.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
298th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Somali vs Ute Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,282,230 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Somalis and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.791 and weighted average of 16.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,666,863 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 17.5%, a difference of 5.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Somali | Ute |
| Minimum | 5.5% | 4.6% |
| Maximum | 56.1% | 73.0% |
| Range | 50.6% | 68.4% |
| Mean | 17.8% | 23.1% |
| Median | 15.2% | 17.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.6% | 25.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 14.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 14.5% |
Demographics Similar to Somalis and Ute by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Somalis are Hispanic or Latino (16.6%, a difference of 0.52%), Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.56%), Guatemalan (16.7%, a difference of 0.90%), Chippewa (16.7%, a difference of 0.93%), and Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.52%), U.S. Virgin Islander (17.3%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (17.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and British West Indian (17.0%, a difference of 2.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |