Portuguese vs Ugandan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Portuguese
Ugandan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Portuguese
Ugandans
20.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
81.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
64.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Portuguese vs Ugandan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,230,754 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.212 and weighted average of 20.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,803,349 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 20.8%, a difference of 1.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Portuguese | Ugandan |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 5.5% |
| Maximum | 50.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 49.2% | 94.5% |
| Mean | 23.2% | 23.7% |
| Median | 22.0% | 20.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.5% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 17.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 17.2% |
Demographics Similar to Portuguese and Ugandans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Immigrants from Denmark (20.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Puget Sound Salish (20.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.38%), Luxembourger (20.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |