Ottawa vs Cherokee Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Ottawa
Cherokee
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Ottawa
Cherokee
13.1%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
3.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
2.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ottawa vs Cherokee Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,940,459 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.308 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 492,462,276 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.451 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 1.1%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ottawa | Cherokee |
| Minimum | 2.8% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 30.4% | 63.0% |
| Range | 27.6% | 62.5% |
| Mean | 13.1% | 19.6% |
| Median | 12.8% | 17.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.9% | 23.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 9.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Ottawa and Cherokee by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Panamanian (13.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Nigerian (13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Puget Sound Salish (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Chickasaw (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (13.1%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Comanche (13.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Salvadoran (13.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Zaire (13.4%, a difference of 0.90%), Immigrants from Nigeria (13.1%, a difference of 0.99%), and Puget Sound Salish (13.1%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Bermudans | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 4.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 4.3 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Fijians | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Chickasaw | 3.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Nigerians | 3.5 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Panamanians | 3.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 3.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 3.4 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 3.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Salvadorans | 2.7 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Cherokee | 2.5 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Comanche | 2.4 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 1.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Crow | 1.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.5 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.5% |
| French American Indians | 1.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 1.3 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Iroquois | 1.2 /100 | #240 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Choctaw | 1.0 /100 | #241 | Tragic 13.6% |