Osage vs Palestinian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Osage
Palestinian
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Osage
Palestinians
17.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
3.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
224th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
90.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Palestinian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,675,394 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.257 and weighted average of 17.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,678,574 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 18.6%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Osage | Palestinian |
Minimum | 9.1% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 47.4% | 40.9% |
Range | 38.4% | 39.1% |
Mean | 20.6% | 16.5% |
Median | 18.3% | 13.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.0% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.3% | 21.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 10.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Osage by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Cambodia (17.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Nonimmigrants (17.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Bermudan (18.0%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Armenia (17.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and Cuban (17.8%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 5.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.6% |
Moroccans | 5.3 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.6% |
Japanese | 4.7 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 17.7% |
Cubans | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 3.6 /100 | #222 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 17.8% |
Osage | 3.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 17.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 17.9% |
Bermudans | 2.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.5 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.0% |
Marshallese | 1.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.1% |
Nepalese | 1.7 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 1.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.2% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Czechoslovakian (15.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Portuguese (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Western Europe (15.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and Pakistani (15.0%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Scottish | 92.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.0% |
South Africans | 92.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Pakistanis | 91.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Czechoslovakians | 91.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 90.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Portuguese | 90.6 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.3 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 90.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 89.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 15.1% |
Mongolians | 89.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 15.2% |
Armenians | 89.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 15.2% |
Canadians | 89.1 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.2% |