New Zealander vs Immigrants from Turkey Family Poverty
COMPARE
New Zealander
Immigrants from Turkey
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
New Zealanders
Immigrants from Turkey
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
96.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Immigrants from Turkey Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,830,262 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387 and weighted average of 8.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,589,899 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.199 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 0.76%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | New Zealander | Immigrants from Turkey |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 19.9% | 18.7% |
Range | 18.8% | 17.0% |
Mean | 7.4% | 7.5% |
Median | 6.4% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 8.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders and Immigrants from Turkey by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Norway (8.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Welsh (8.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (8.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Africa (8.1%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Immigrants from Philippines (8.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Pakistan (8.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Tlingit-Haida (8.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Czechoslovakian (8.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (8.1%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |