Lumbee vs Celtic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Lumbee
Celtic
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Lumbee
Celtics
30.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
25.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Celtic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,796,627 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121 and weighted average of 30.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,177,387 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.158 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 80.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee | Celtic |
| Minimum | 10.0% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 78.3% | 70.9% |
| Range | 68.3% | 67.6% |
| Mean | 38.6% | 25.7% |
| Median | 35.6% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.0% | 15.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.4% | 34.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.4% | 18.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.2% | 14.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.0% | 14.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Navajo (30.5%, a difference of 0.78%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 2.9%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.1%), Puerto Rican (32.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and Pima (28.2%, a difference of 8.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Costa Rica (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Spaniard (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lebanon (17.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and Spanish (16.9%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.8% |
| Kenyans | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 31.3 /100 | #192 | Fair 16.8% |
| Aleuts | 28.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 16.9% |
| Spanish | 28.6 /100 | #194 | Fair 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 25.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.0% |
| Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
| Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 22.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 22.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 17.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.2% |
| Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |