Lumbee vs Dominican Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Lumbee
Dominican
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Lumbee
Dominicans
30.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Dominican Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,796,627 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121 and weighted average of 30.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 349,076,345 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Dominicans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 23.7%, a difference of 29.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lumbee | Dominican |
Minimum | 10.0% | 6.6% |
Maximum | 78.3% | 52.5% |
Range | 68.3% | 45.9% |
Mean | 38.6% | 27.0% |
Median | 35.6% | 26.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.0% | 19.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.4% | 32.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.4% | 12.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.2% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.0% | 8.9% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee and Dominicans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Navajo (30.5%, a difference of 0.78%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 2.9%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.1%), Pima (28.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Dominicans are Kiowa (23.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (23.8%, a difference of 0.65%), Apache (23.8%, a difference of 0.70%), Native/Alaskan (24.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and Central American Indian (22.8%, a difference of 3.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 22.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 22.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |