Shoshone vs Celtic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Shoshone
Celtic
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Shoshone
Celtics
18.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
25.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Shoshone vs Celtic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,320,610 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.556 and weighted average of 18.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,177,387 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.158 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 11.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Shoshone | Celtic |
Minimum | 2.5% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 70.9% |
Range | 47.5% | 67.6% |
Mean | 21.8% | 25.7% |
Median | 18.9% | 20.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.4% | 15.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.0% | 34.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.6% | 18.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.0% | 14.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 14.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Shoshone by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Immigrants from Laos (18.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Ecuadorian (18.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (18.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Ghana (18.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Cuba (18.8%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
Americans | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 18.8% |
Ecuadorians | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.8% |
Shoshone | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 18.9% |
French American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 19.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 19.2% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 19.2% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Costa Rica (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Spaniard (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lebanon (17.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and Spanish (16.9%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.8% |
Kenyans | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Azores | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 31.3 /100 | #192 | Fair 16.8% |
Aleuts | 28.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 16.9% |
Spanish | 28.6 /100 | #194 | Fair 16.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 25.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.0% |
Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 22.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 22.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 17.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.2% |
Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |