Lumbee vs Filipino Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Lumbee
Filipino
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Lumbee
Filipinos
30.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Filipino Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,796,627 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121 and weighted average of 30.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,600,431 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.075 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 169.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee | Filipino |
| Minimum | 10.0% | 0.99% |
| Maximum | 78.3% | 31.6% |
| Range | 68.3% | 30.7% |
| Mean | 38.6% | 8.9% |
| Median | 35.6% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.0% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.4% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.4% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.2% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.0% | 5.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Navajo (30.5%, a difference of 0.78%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 2.9%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.1%), Puerto Rican (32.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and Pima (28.2%, a difference of 8.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Tsimshian (11.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Taiwan (11.3%, a difference of 0.87%), Immigrants from India (11.0%, a difference of 3.5%), Thai (11.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 8.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |