Lithuanian vs Ethiopian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Ethiopian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Lithuanians
Ethiopians
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
56.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Ethiopian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,480,494 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.503 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,096,222 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.069 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 16.5%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lithuanian | Ethiopian |
| Minimum | 0.15% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 53.0% | 28.0% |
| Range | 52.8% | 27.0% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 10.6% |
| Median | 8.5% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.0% | 11.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 4.9% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Scotland (9.6%, a difference of 0.55%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are White/Caucasian (11.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (11.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Spain (11.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Albania (11.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Hungarian (11.1%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
| Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
| Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
| Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
| Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 55.5 /100 | #165 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 55.3 /100 | #166 | Average 11.1% |
| Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 54.2 /100 | #169 | Average 11.1% |
| South Americans | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 11.1% |
| Uruguayans | 51.0 /100 | #171 | Average 11.2% |