Laotian vs English Female Poverty
COMPARE
Laotian
English
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Laotians
English
12.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
96.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian vs English Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,727,554 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,145,061 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 1.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Laotian | English |
Minimum | 0.15% | 0.38% |
Maximum | 22.9% | 72.5% |
Range | 22.8% | 72.2% |
Mean | 10.9% | 17.3% |
Median | 11.4% | 12.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 19.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 13.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 13.3% |
Demographics Similar to Laotians and English by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Portuguese (12.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Turkey (12.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.42%), and Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to English are Finnish (12.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Denmark (12.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Belgian (12.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Czechoslovakian (12.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |