Korean vs Burmese Poverty
COMPARE
Korean
Burmese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Koreans
Burmese
10.9%
POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Korean vs Burmese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,388,718 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Koreans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,896,901 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.173 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 2.0%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Korean | Burmese |
Minimum | 0.27% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 27.2% | 37.7% |
Range | 27.0% | 36.2% |
Mean | 9.8% | 9.3% |
Median | 9.3% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 10.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Koreans and Burmese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Koreans are Immigrants from Singapore (10.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Moldova (10.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Iran (10.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Russian (10.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (10.8%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Croatian (10.6%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Korea (10.7%, a difference of 0.42%), Italian (10.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and Greek (10.7%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Tongans | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Cypriots | 99.3 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Russians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 10.9% |