Iroquois vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Female Poverty
COMPARE
Iroquois
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Iroquois
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
15.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
251st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,228,109 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.698 and weighted average of 15.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,462,695 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.583 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 3.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago |
Minimum | 4.7% | 0.35% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 80.6% |
Range | 95.3% | 80.3% |
Mean | 22.4% | 14.7% |
Median | 16.7% | 13.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.0% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.5% | 16.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.0% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.8% | 8.7% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.85%), and Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.92%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (15.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Liberian (15.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (15.4%, a difference of 0.53%), and Ottawa (15.5%, a difference of 0.84%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |