Iroquois vs Indonesian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Iroquois
Indonesian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Iroquois
Indonesians
15.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
288th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Indonesian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,228,109 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.698 and weighted average of 15.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,639,231 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indonesians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 16.4%, a difference of 3.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Indonesian |
Minimum | 4.7% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 36.2% |
Range | 95.3% | 34.9% |
Mean | 22.4% | 17.1% |
Median | 16.7% | 16.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.0% | 12.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.5% | 19.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.0% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.8% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Indonesians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.54%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.77%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indonesians are Immigrants from Belize (16.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Inupiat (16.2%, a difference of 0.74%), Comanche (16.2%, a difference of 1.2%), Spanish American (16.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Cuba (16.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 16.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 16.4% |