Inupiat vs Immigrants from El Salvador Female Poverty
COMPARE
Inupiat
Immigrants from El Salvador
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Inupiat
Immigrants from El Salvador
16.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
266th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Immigrants from El Salvador Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,314,579 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.182 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,675,141 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.715 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 3.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Inupiat | Immigrants from El Salvador |
Minimum | 2.8% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 63.9% | 96.7% |
Mean | 23.7% | 17.2% |
Median | 17.7% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.3% | 18.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.7% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.6% | 11.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.5% | 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Inupiat and Immigrants from El Salvador by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Comanche (16.2%, a difference of 0.44%), Spanish American (16.2%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Cuba (16.1%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Haiti (16.1%, a difference of 0.65%), and West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.81%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.49%), Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.85%), Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |