Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 498,768,051 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.143 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,952,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 19.6%, a difference of 27.5%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from South Eastern Asia	Chickasaw
Minimum	3.0%	3.8%
Maximum	54.5%	100.0%
Range	51.5%	96.2%
Mean	15.4%	26.8%
Median	15.0%	21.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	12.7%	17.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	17.1%	31.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.4%	13.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.0%	15.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.0%	15.4%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are Albanian (15.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Norway (15.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Puget Sound Salish (15.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Scottish (15.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (15.4%, a difference of 0.18%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Portuguese	91.8 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 15.3%
Irish	91.5 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 15.3%
Carpatho Rusyns	91.4 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 15.3%
Peruvians	91.2 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 15.4%
Scottish	91.0 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| Norway	90.8 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 15.4%
Albanians	90.5 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	90.5 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 15.4%
Puget Sound Salish	90.1 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| Western Europe	90.0 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 15.4%
Mongolians	89.7 /100 \| #132	Excellent 15.4%
Brazilians	89.6 /100 \| #133	Excellent 15.4%
Immigrants \| Spain	89.1 /100 \| #134	Excellent 15.5%
Czechoslovakians	89.0 /100 \| #135	Excellent 15.5%
Native Hawaiians	89.0 /100 \| #136	Excellent 15.5%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.67%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.3 /100 \| #255	Tragic 19.3%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.2 /100 \| #256	Tragic 19.3%
Guyanese	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 19.4%
Salvadorans	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 19.4%
Ottawa	0.2 /100 \| #259	Tragic 19.4%
Mexican American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #260	Tragic 19.5%
Vietnamese	0.2 /100 \| #261	Tragic 19.5%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #262	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 19.7%
Jamaicans	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 19.7%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 19.8%
Spanish Americans	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 19.8%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 19.9%
Spanish American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #268	Tragic 19.9%
Liberians	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 19.9%