Immigrants from France vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,385,338 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from France and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.638 and weighted average of 14.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,952,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 19.6%, a difference of 31.4%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from France	Chickasaw
Minimum	3.6%	3.8%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	96.4%	96.2%
Mean	26.0%	26.8%
Median	17.6%	21.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	9.3%	17.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	28.5%	31.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	19.2%	13.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	26.7%	15.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	25.9%	15.4%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from France by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from France are German (14.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Switzerland (14.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Latvia (14.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Basque (15.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from North America (14.9%, a difference of 0.34%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Jordanians	97.1 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 14.8%
Northern Europeans	97.0 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 14.8%
Immigrants \| Belarus	97.0 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 14.8%
Austrians	96.7 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| North America	96.6 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	96.3 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 14.9%
Germans	96.3 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| France	96.2 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| Latvia	96.1 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 14.9%
Basques	95.9 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| Egypt	95.7 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 15.0%
Paraguayans	95.7 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| South Africa	95.6 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.6 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 15.0%
British	95.6 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 15.0%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.67%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.3 /100 \| #255	Tragic 19.3%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.2 /100 \| #256	Tragic 19.3%
Guyanese	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 19.4%
Salvadorans	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 19.4%
Ottawa	0.2 /100 \| #259	Tragic 19.4%
Mexican American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #260	Tragic 19.5%
Vietnamese	0.2 /100 \| #261	Tragic 19.5%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #262	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 19.7%
Jamaicans	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 19.7%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 19.8%
Spanish Americans	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 19.8%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 19.9%
Spanish American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #268	Tragic 19.9%
Liberians	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 19.9%