Guamanian/Chamorro vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Guamanian/Chamorro
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Guamanians/Chamorros
Chickasaw
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
75.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,387,643 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.713 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,952,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 19.6%, a difference of 23.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guamanian/Chamorro | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.0% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 98.0% | 96.2% |
Mean | 23.8% | 26.8% |
Median | 14.9% | 21.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 17.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.9% | 31.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.2% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.0% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.7% | 15.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Slovak (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Fiji (15.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Colombian (15.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |