Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chinese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Chinese
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Chinese
12.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chinese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 461,235,402 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.481 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,581,051 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 3.2%.
![Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chinese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/child-poverty-girls-under-16/immigrants-from-south-central-asia-vs-chinese-child-poverty-girls-under-16-chart.webp)
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Chinese |
Minimum | 1.2% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 26.1% | 53.8% |
Range | 24.8% | 51.4% |
Mean | 9.3% | 15.2% |
Median | 8.6% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.1% | 17.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 12.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia and Chinese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Bhutanese (12.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ireland (12.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Iran (12.6%, a difference of 1.3%), Burmese (13.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and Okinawan (13.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Iranian (12.4%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.5%, a difference of 0.96%), Immigrants from Iran (12.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and Bhutanese (12.7%, a difference of 3.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |