Bulgarian vs Chinese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Chinese
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Bulgarians
Chinese
13.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Chinese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,945,490 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.083 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,581,051 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 6.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bulgarian | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.87% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 46.7% | 53.8% |
Range | 45.8% | 51.4% |
Mean | 12.7% | 15.2% |
Median | 11.4% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.4% | 17.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 12.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians and Chinese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Immigrants from Korea (13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Lithuania (13.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Cypriot (13.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Okinawan (13.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and Burmese (13.0%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Iranian (12.4%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.5%, a difference of 0.96%), Immigrants from Iran (12.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (12.7%, a difference of 3.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |