Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Turkish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Turkish
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Turks
12.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Turkish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 461,235,402 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.481 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,627,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 13.7%, a difference of 7.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Turkish |
Minimum | 1.2% | 0.50% |
Maximum | 26.1% | 71.9% |
Range | 24.8% | 71.4% |
Mean | 9.3% | 13.5% |
Median | 8.6% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.1% | 15.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia and Turks by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Bhutanese (12.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ireland (12.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Burmese (13.0%, a difference of 2.2%), Okinawan (13.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (13.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.79%), Tongan (13.6%, a difference of 0.91%), Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |