Immigrants from China vs Welsh Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Welsh
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Welsh
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
91.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Welsh Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,442,741 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 527,858,131 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.595 and weighted average of 12.7%, a difference of 1.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Welsh |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 26.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 23.9% | 97.0% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 19.2% |
| Median | 11.5% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.0% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 16.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 16.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Welsh by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Puget Sound Salish (12.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Russia (12.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Israel (12.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (12.7%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |