Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Southern Europe
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Southern Europe
11.6%
POVERTY
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
POVERTY
90.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,587,979 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 402,613,085 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.309 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 0.020%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Southern Europe |
Minimum | 3.0% | 6.6% |
Maximum | 26.5% | 21.8% |
Range | 23.5% | 15.2% |
Mean | 11.4% | 12.2% |
Median | 10.8% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 9.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 14.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Southern Europe by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Belarus (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), French Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Albanian (11.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Turkey (11.6%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Southern Europe are Immigrants from Belarus (11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), French Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Albanian (11.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Turkey (11.6%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 89.0 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.7% |
New Zealanders | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.7% |