Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Brazil Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Brazil
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Brazil
11.6%
POVERTY
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
POVERTY
88.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Brazil Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,587,979 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 342,843,961 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.255 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 0.70%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Brazil |
Minimum | 3.0% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 26.5% | 27.4% |
Range | 23.5% | 25.1% |
Mean | 11.4% | 11.3% |
Median | 10.8% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 8.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 13.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Brazil by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belarus (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), French Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Albanian (11.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Soviet Union (11.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (11.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Argentina (11.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Hungary (11.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and New Zealander (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 89.0 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.7% |
New Zealanders | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.7% |
Soviet Union | 88.4 /100 | #124 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 88.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 88.0 /100 | #126 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Israel | 87.4 /100 | #128 | Excellent 11.7% |
South Africans | 87.0 /100 | #129 | Excellent 11.7% |