French Canadian vs Icelander Female Poverty
COMPARE
French Canadian
Icelander
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
French Canadians
Icelanders
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
81.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
French Canadian vs Icelander Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,012,927 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.522 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,608,280 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 1.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | French Canadian | Icelander |
Minimum | 4.4% | 0.47% |
Maximum | 49.1% | 33.3% |
Range | 44.7% | 32.9% |
Mean | 16.1% | 11.8% |
Median | 12.8% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.7% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 14.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to French Canadians and Icelanders by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to French Canadians are Immigrants from Hungary (12.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Argentinean (12.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Pakistani (12.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Basque (12.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from France (12.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Chilean (12.9%, a difference of 0.65%), and Peruvian (12.9%, a difference of 0.74%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |