Creek vs Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Creek
Czechoslovakian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Creek
Czechoslovakians
21.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,656,713 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 21.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,979,827 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.175 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 40.7%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Creek | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 4.2% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 75.0% | 54.7% |
Range | 70.8% | 51.9% |
Mean | 28.7% | 24.4% |
Median | 25.2% | 20.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.0% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.5% | 32.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.5% | 19.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.5% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.4% | 13.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Creek by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Seminole (21.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Bahamian (21.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.6%, a difference of 0.19%), British West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and Ute (21.6%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.7% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.7% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tlingit-Haida (15.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Norway (15.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Palestinian (15.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Carpatho Rusyn (15.4%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Native Hawaiians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.2% |
South Africans | 93.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Scottish | 93.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Norway | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Tlingit-Haida | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 92.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Palestinians | 91.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Canadians | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 88.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.5% |