Scotch-Irish vs Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Scotch-Irish
Czechoslovakian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Scotch-Irish
Czechoslovakians
16.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
47.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scotch-Irish vs Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 530,822,758 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.662 and weighted average of 16.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,979,827 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.175 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 7.6%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scotch-Irish | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 10.0% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 54.7% |
| Range | 90.0% | 51.9% |
| Mean | 33.9% | 24.4% |
| Median | 23.9% | 20.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.0% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 41.8% | 32.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.8% | 19.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.8% | 13.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.6% | 13.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Hungarian (16.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Ethiopian (16.5%, a difference of 0.040%), White/Caucasian (16.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Syria (16.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Hawaiian (16.5%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 51.3 /100 | #171 | Average 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 50.8 /100 | #172 | Average 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 50.5 /100 | #173 | Average 16.4% |
| Uruguayans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 49.0 /100 | #175 | Average 16.5% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 48.2 /100 | #176 | Average 16.5% |
| Ethiopians | 47.8 /100 | #177 | Average 16.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 47.5 /100 | #178 | Average 16.5% |
| Hungarians | 47.3 /100 | #179 | Average 16.5% |
| Hawaiians | 45.5 /100 | #180 | Average 16.5% |
| South American Indians | 44.3 /100 | #181 | Average 16.5% |
| Lebanese | 43.3 /100 | #182 | Average 16.6% |
| Kenyans | 41.0 /100 | #183 | Average 16.6% |
| Celtics | 40.6 /100 | #184 | Average 16.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 40.4 /100 | #185 | Average 16.6% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tlingit-Haida (15.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Norway (15.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Palestinian (15.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Carpatho Rusyn (15.4%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Native Hawaiians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Belgians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| South Africans | 93.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Scottish | 93.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 92.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Palestinians | 91.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 91.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Canadians | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Mongolians | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 88.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.5% |