Cree vs Potawatomi Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cree
Potawatomi
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Cree
Potawatomi
15.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
247th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cree vs Potawatomi Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,205,859 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cree and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,742,920 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 1.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cree | Potawatomi |
Minimum | 1.9% | 3.1% |
Maximum | 46.1% | 63.6% |
Range | 44.3% | 60.6% |
Mean | 18.3% | 20.2% |
Median | 15.5% | 17.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 12.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.2% | 24.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.7% | 12.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.6% | 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Cree and Potawatomi by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cree are French American Indian (15.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Armenia (15.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Laos (15.0%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (15.2%, a difference of 0.78%), and Sudanese (15.2%, a difference of 0.84%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Nigerians | 1.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 14.8% |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |