Central American vs Bangladeshi Female Poverty
COMPARE
Central American
Bangladeshi
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Central Americans
Bangladeshis
16.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
276th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American vs Bangladeshi Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 503,924,730 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.554 and weighted average of 16.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,353,886 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 16.0%, a difference of 0.19%.
![Central American vs Bangladeshi Female Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/female-poverty/central-americans-vs-bangladeshis-female-poverty-chart.webp)
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American | Bangladeshi |
Minimum | 1.3% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 31.7% |
Range | 98.8% | 29.0% |
Mean | 20.2% | 16.6% |
Median | 16.9% | 15.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.3% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.2% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.8% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans and Bangladeshis by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Barbados (16.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Immigrants from Barbados (16.0%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from West Indies (16.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |