Immigrants from Liberia vs Bangladeshi Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Liberia
Bangladeshi
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Liberia
Bangladeshis
15.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Liberia vs Bangladeshi Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,246,592 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.579 and weighted average of 15.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,353,886 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 16.0%, a difference of 2.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Liberia | Bangladeshi |
Minimum | 3.5% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 45.5% | 31.7% |
Range | 42.0% | 29.0% |
Mean | 16.9% | 16.6% |
Median | 14.0% | 15.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.7% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.6% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Liberia and Bangladeshis by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Liberia are Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Cherokee (15.6%, a difference of 0.42%), Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Central American (16.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Barbados (16.0%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from West Indies (16.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |