Cape Verdean vs Ecuadorian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Cape Verdean
Ecuadorian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Cape Verdeans
Ecuadorians
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cape Verdean vs Ecuadorian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,439,266 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,108,203 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.144 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 1.5%.
![Cape Verdean vs Ecuadorian Family Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/family-poverty/cape-verdeans-vs-ecuadorians-family-poverty-chart.webp)
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cape Verdean | Ecuadorian |
Minimum | 0.95% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 31.5% | 21.9% |
Range | 30.5% | 20.5% |
Mean | 10.5% | 10.5% |
Median | 9.9% | 10.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 8.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 12.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Cape Verdeans and Ecuadorians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (10.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Spanish American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Western Africa (10.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Zaire (10.7%, a difference of 0.41%), Iroquois (10.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.64%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |