Cape Verdean vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Poverty
COMPARE
Cape Verdean
Immigrants from Ghana
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Cape Verdeans
Immigrants from Ghana
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cape Verdean vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,439,266 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,614,936 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.019 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 0.85%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cape Verdean | Immigrants from Ghana |
Minimum | 0.95% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 31.5% | 31.3% |
Range | 30.5% | 29.3% |
Mean | 10.5% | 11.0% |
Median | 9.9% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 13.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Cape Verdeans and Immigrants from Ghana by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (10.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Spanish American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |