Bolivian vs Croatian Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Bolivian
Croatian
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Bolivians
Croatians
8.9%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
73.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Croatian Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,604,467 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059 and weighted average of 8.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,480,501 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 23.5%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bolivian | Croatian |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.68% |
Maximum | 25.5% | 48.4% |
Range | 24.5% | 47.7% |
Mean | 8.2% | 15.7% |
Median | 7.5% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 18.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 8.9% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Bolivians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from Singapore (8.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Korea (9.0%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (8.9%, a difference of 0.89%), Indian (Asian) (8.9%, a difference of 0.98%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (8.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Soviet Union | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Croatians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Serbian (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from North America (11.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Guyanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Guyana (11.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (11.0%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | England | 77.4 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Canada | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
Moroccans | 76.4 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 76.2 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
Guyanese | 75.1 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | North America | 74.9 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
Serbians | 73.6 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
Croatians | 73.1 /100 | #160 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 70.1 /100 | #161 | Good 11.1% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 11.1% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 66.6 /100 | #163 | Good 11.1% |
Pakistanis | 65.8 /100 | #164 | Good 11.1% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 65.2 /100 | #165 | Good 11.1% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 63.8 /100 | #166 | Good 11.1% |
Austrians | 63.2 /100 | #167 | Good 11.1% |