Bhutanese vs African Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bhutanese
African
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Bhutanese
Africans
17.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
24.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
296th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs African Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,564,428 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.334 and weighted average of 17.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,525,497 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Africans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.201 and weighted average of 24.8%, a difference of 39.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | African |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 41.4% | 60.3% |
| Range | 40.1% | 58.4% |
| Mean | 15.9% | 28.3% |
| Median | 15.1% | 27.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 23.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.9% | 34.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 11.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.82%), and Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
Demographics Similar to Africans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Immigrants from Central America (24.8%, a difference of 0.28%), Hispanic or Latino (24.6%, a difference of 0.48%), Yaqui (24.9%, a difference of 0.48%), French American Indian (24.6%, a difference of 0.83%), and American (24.5%, a difference of 0.98%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 24.4% |
| Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 24.5% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 24.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 24.6% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 24.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 24.8% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 24.9% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |