Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Lithuania Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Lithuania
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Lithuania
17.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Lithuania Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,564,428 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.334 and weighted average of 17.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,892,262 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.424 and weighted average of 17.8%, a difference of 0.50%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Immigrants from Lithuania |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 4.2% |
| Maximum | 41.4% | 30.7% |
| Range | 40.1% | 26.6% |
| Mean | 15.9% | 14.7% |
| Median | 15.1% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.9% | 17.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Immigrants from Lithuania by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.82%), Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Iran (17.5%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Indian (Asian) (17.9%, a difference of 0.91%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |