Bhutanese vs Guamanian/Chamorro Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Guamanian/Chamorro
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Bhutanese
Guamanians/Chamorros
17.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
13.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Guamanian/Chamorro Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,564,428 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.334 and weighted average of 17.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,498,532 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.802 and weighted average of 21.6%, a difference of 22.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | Guamanian/Chamorro |
Minimum | 1.3% | 14.3% |
Maximum | 41.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 40.1% | 85.7% |
Mean | 15.9% | 32.5% |
Median | 15.1% | 25.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 20.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.9% | 37.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 17.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 18.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 18.0% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.82%), and Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Jamaican (21.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Icelander (21.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (21.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Panama (21.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (21.6%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Belgians | 16.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 21.5% |
Ghanaians | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 21.6% |
Haitians | 15.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Panama | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 21.6% |
Icelanders | 14.0 /100 | #211 | Poor 21.6% |
Jamaicans | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 21.6% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 13.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 21.6% |
Ecuadorians | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 21.7% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 11.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 21.7% |
Nepalese | 9.7 /100 | #218 | Tragic 21.7% |
Panamanians | 9.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 21.7% |
Germans | 8.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 21.8% |