Armenian vs Pakistani Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Armenian
Pakistani
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Armenians
Pakistanis
15.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
87.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
92.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian vs Pakistani Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,744,941 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.080 and weighted average of 15.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,174,379 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.683 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 1.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Armenian | Pakistani |
Minimum | 2.6% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 32.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 30.1% | 97.5% |
Mean | 13.8% | 23.5% |
Median | 11.7% | 16.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 13.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 27.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 14.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 20.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 20.0% |
Demographics Similar to Armenians and Pakistanis by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Vietnam (15.5%, a difference of 0.10%), South African (15.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Native Hawaiian (15.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Czechoslovakian (15.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Spain (15.5%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are English (15.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Portuguese (15.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Irish (15.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and Carpatho Rusyn (15.3%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Peruvians | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |