Armenian vs Pakistani Female Poverty
COMPARE
Armenian
Pakistani
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Armenians
Pakistanis
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
70.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
83.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian vs Pakistani Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,749,032 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 335,177,271 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.231 and weighted average of 12.9%, a difference of 1.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Armenian | Pakistani |
Minimum | 2.9% | 0.74% |
Maximum | 26.9% | 44.1% |
Range | 24.0% | 43.3% |
Mean | 12.6% | 14.0% |
Median | 12.1% | 12.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 15.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Armenians and Pakistanis by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Basque (12.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from France (12.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Chilean (12.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Icelander (13.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |