Armenian vs Choctaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Armenian
Choctaw
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Armenians
Choctaw
15.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
87.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
301st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian vs Choctaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,744,941 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.080 and weighted average of 15.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,369,694 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.445 and weighted average of 21.1%, a difference of 36.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Armenian | Choctaw |
Minimum | 2.6% | 5.3% |
Maximum | 32.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 30.1% | 94.7% |
Mean | 13.8% | 33.5% |
Median | 11.7% | 26.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 21.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 33.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 12.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 21.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 21.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Armenians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Vietnam (15.5%, a difference of 0.10%), New Zealander (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Jordan (15.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Canadian (15.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and South African (15.5%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Seminole (21.2%, a difference of 0.12%), British West Indian (21.3%, a difference of 0.57%), Indonesian (21.3%, a difference of 0.60%), Somali (21.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and Hispanic or Latino (21.0%, a difference of 0.93%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 20.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 20.8% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 20.9% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 21.0% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.2% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |