Alsatian vs Yugoslavian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Alsatian
Yugoslavian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Alsatians
Yugoslavians
14.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
220th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
76.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alsatian vs Yugoslavian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,678,421 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.286 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,591,967 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 10.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alsatian | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 3.4% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 23.1% | 30.2% |
| Range | 19.7% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 11.5% | 12.4% |
| Median | 10.5% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Alsatians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Cambodia (14.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Nonimmigrants (14.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |