Subsaharan African vs Yugoslavian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Yugoslavian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Yugoslavians
15.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
76.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Yugoslavian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,469,907 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.460 and weighted average of 15.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,591,967 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 20.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Subsaharan African | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 0.38% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 69.8% | 30.2% |
| Range | 69.4% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 20.8% | 12.4% |
| Median | 16.0% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.9% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.4% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.69%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |